Sneak previews of our current performances, or sweet memories of our workshops and past festival events can be watched here. MORE
I’m sitting on my aura
“… politics is activity already in motion. It does not await ignition.” – Randy Martin
Currently I am looking at the ways in which the actions in a society of individuals produce an experience of multivalent, multi-layered, unstable, and dynamic meaning(s). Perhaps this is another way of defining "choreography". I think that the value of choreography now is that it can be a framework for deploying difference in a time of increasing anxiety. I would like to share these questions and explorations in the context of a workshop.
In my explorations thus far I have been returning to strategies of improvisation and movement building that I used earlier in my career, as well as some that have stuck with me over the years. I am exploring how bodies experience energy and identity in proximity and distance to one another. I keep returning to a kinetics that is insistent and multi-directional, dissatisfied with its own arrivals and representations. But now I am layering these approaches with knowledge I have amassed from years of studies into somatics, queer theory, and theories about perception. Language – an element of my work for many years now – has been coming out as I dance in more fragmented ways than before. I am also playing with some basic lighting elements, with special attention to the qualitative differences between fluorescent and incandescent (filament-based) lighting fixtures. I am also interested in dancing in semi or near darkness, enjoying its ability to frustrate the act of seeing while also suggesting mystery and sexuality. Clothes are coming off a lot. It’s as if I am discovering and then "re-covering" my body, the bodies of others through the act of dancing. I am interested in working with a diverse range of dancers. I am tuned in to the erotics that emerge from sharing space with other people, and the excitement and sadness you feel when people appear or disappear.
I wonder if it is possible to wrest the dance-historical category of "abstraction" from its history as a tool of whiteness. By this I mean that, traditionally in the United States, white choreographers have used the word abstraction to refer to some kind of identity-less poetics of bodies and movement that is somehow more "pure" or "neutral" than "content-based" movement or work. I reject this definition, but I also see how my history as a Latino dancer/choreographer has also often been about having to make some kind of decision between this abstract/content binary. I know the conversation is different in European contexts but I think there are analaguous divides between form and content. I think we are in a moment of evolution and that these binaries are being slowly and methodically dismantled. I think that there is another way and I am looking for it through my current work.
ArtistBio: Miguel Gutierrez